Skip navigation to main content

Links We Liked for 9 February 2008

Written by Chris Routledge, 9th February 2008

Literary blogs seem to be taking over from the regular book review pages. In terms of the sheer number of books reviewed and the international audience available, print publications can't compete. A recent piece at Vulpes Libris gives an excellent overview of how the amateurs and the professionals co-exist and asks 'Book Bloggers: The Saviour of Small Publishers? The End of Decent Criticism? Or Unpaid Cheerleaders?' (via Dovegreyreader). Another post at the OUP Blog looks at a different aspect of this: Should Book Authors Blog?

The excellent Lifehacker entreats us to read more ebooks and points at an article in ePublishersweekly giving 30 Benefits of Ebooks. My feelings are mixed about this, but one commenter on the Lifehacker post concludes that ebooks are 'about as sensible as electronic socks'.

Earlier last week Andrew Saikali wrote an interesting piece for The Millions on films about writers and the writing process.

Meanwhile on Shrove Tuesday Samuel Pepys pondered an age-old question.

Posted by Chris Routledge. Powered by Qumana

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Shared Reading

Heard us on the radio? | BBC Radio 5 Live Word Matters

As part of its nationwide conversation about adult literacy – Word Matters, BBC Radio 5 Live broadcast its Drive Time show from The Reader…

Read more
Important Updates

Rebuilding the Reading Revolution: Shared Reading Groups Open to All

In-person Shared Reading is returning around the UK as volunteers and group members begin meeting again in local libraries and other community venues.  So far…

Read more
Publications

New poetry anthology to celebrate National Poetry Day

As National Poetry Day approaches on Thursday 7th October, we’ve been busy working on a new poetry anthology and planning…

Contact us

Get in touch and be part of the story
You can also speak to us on: 0151 729 2200
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.